Ecology, Climate Change and Related News

Conservation Science for a Healthy Planet

Challenges and Opportunities for Climate-Smart Infrastructure in California

Leave a Comment
By Jamesine Rogers Gibson November 20, 2017 Read full Union of Concerned Scientists post here

“Climate-smart” infrastructure means designing and building infrastructure with future climate projections in mind, instead of building infrastructure based on past trends. Climate-smart design takes advantage of opportunities to reduce heat-trapping emissions and encourages innovative solutions to bring social, economic, health, and environmental benefits to Californians. 

In the next few years, California will invest billions of dollars in new infrastructure, as well as in maintaining and retrofitting existing systems. In this white paper, we outline key principles, barriers, and recommendations to leverage these investments to strengthen the climate resilience of California’s infrastructure system, and ensure it will continue to deliver key services for many decades to come.

Principles for climate-smart infrastructure include:

  1. Applying rigorous science
  2. Prioritizing equitable outcomes
  3. Spending limited resources wisely
  4. Planning proactively, holistically, and transparently

….Our recommendations focus on ways the state, as well as local governments, can overcome existing barriers to do just that:

  • Update standards and codes.
  • Increase local technical capacity.
  • Establish a state coordinating center to support state agencies.
  • Incorporate costs of climate change and benefits of climate resilience into economic assessments, and develop data and tools for analyses.
  • Require meaningful climate-smart criteria for use of public funds.
  • Leverage existing and identify new sources of funding and creative financing for climate resilient infrastructure.
  • Encourage financial transparency of climate risks for public infrastructure projects.
  • Plan in advance for climate-smart disaster recovery efforts.
  • Increase local predevelopment capacity, and transparency and inclusion in decision-making.
  • Ensure better interjurisdictional and cross-sectoral coordination at both the state and local levels.

View all articles

Comments are closed